paradak

September 9, 2009

Parasitic and other sheep diseases being monitored at NSW abattoirs

The following article is by Dr Bruce Watt of Tablelands LHPA (central tablelands area of NSW) and is published here with permission.

(Hyperlinks added by blog owner).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ABATTOIR MONITORING NOW REPORTING ON A RANGE OF SHEEP DISEASES

In the last few weeks, a number of sheep producers have phoned to ask me about bladder worm (Cysticercus tenuicollis) in sheep. The reason for the sudden interest in this parasite is that these producers have recently consigned sheep for slaughter. Abattoir meat inspectors have detected bladder worm in the carcase. These finding have now been reported back to producers via the National Sheep Health Monitoring Program.

The program is being piloted in the Tablelands LHPA. Meat inspectors are reporting on a wide range of conditions from hydatids, sheep measles, liver fluke, OJD (ovine Johnes disease)  and pneumonia to grass seeds, dog bites and bruising.

Dr Ian Links, Biosecurity Special Projects Officer who works for an alliance between Industry and Investment NSW and CSU Wagga then collates and distributes the reports to producers.

Bladder worm is a tapeworm cyst. It is quite common and is sometimes mistaken for hydatids. However as the name suggests the cysts look like a bladder filled with clear fluid. It also contains a white spot, the tapeworm head. These cysts occur around the liver while the adult tapeworm lives in dogs.

I needed to know more before answering the questions these producers put to me so I turned to Dr David Jenkins now also at CSU. I have known David for nearly thirty years and have always enjoyed his infectious enthusiasm. He is also a world expert on tapeworms.

David reminded me that dogs acquire the tapeworm when they are fed sheep offal that contains the cysts. The mature tapeworms inside dogs produce segments every day or two and these segments contain a massive number of eggs. These eggs are also tough, surviving for a year or two.

Sheep consume the eggs when they eat contaminated pasture. After the eggs hatch inside the sheep, the little worms burrow through the gut wall and migrate through the liver causing damage along the way. If sheep eat sufficient larval their health and productivity can be affected.

The larvae then develop to form a cyst on the liver while they wait for the opportunity to become a dog’s breakfast and complete their life cycle.

Bladder worms are harmless to dogs and people but their presence indicates that tapeworms are maturing in home or visiting dogs. This means that these dogs could also be carrying the much more serious hydatid tapeworm or the tapeworm that cause sheep measles.

If you have lived in rural NSW for a generation or two you will almost certainly know someone who has suffered the consequences of hydatid cysts. As you will know, they are dangerous and can be fatal.

Sheep measles causes small white cysts through the meat leading to carcase condemnation. Fortunately, it is not a health risk to consumers but the rice grain sized lumps in their roast do not impress them. You will also not be impressed when the abattoir reports to you that they have condemned a proportion of your consignment.

Therefore, if your get a report of bladder worms in your sheep consignment take it as a gentle reminder that you need to control tapeworms in your dogs. You can do this by dosing them every 4-6 weeks (using a product containing praziquantel) and by ensuring that your dogs and those of your visitors are not fed fresh sheep meat (unless it has been frozen for 14days) or offal.

Remember that dogs belonging to casual farm workers are a source of tapeworms. It is recommended that you ask that they be tied up for 3 days after dosing and their droppings collected and disposed of safely.

The National Sheep Health Monitoring Program has the potential to deliver valuable information both to individual farmers and to the region. I am sure I will be reporting more of its findings to you in the future. I would like to commend The Sheepmeat Council of Australia, WoolProducers Australia and Industry and Investment for supporting this initiative.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

For further information on larval cestodes of sheep and other animals see:

The following Primefacts at the NSW DII website:

The sheep measles Primefact also has a table with a summary of ‘cysts of larval cestodes (tapeworms) of sheep and cattle’.

Also see the WormBoss website: www.wool.com/wormboss (The old URL, www.wormboss.com.au , will redirect to the new location).

While you are there, spend a few minutes doing the WormBoss on-line Survey:-)

September 8, 2009

Treating for stomach fluke in ruminants

This follows on from an email from a vet asking about treating for paramphistomes. This and other aspects of stomach fluke is discussed in the primefact on stomach fluke. Also see WormBoss: www.wool.com/wormboss

Firstly, the mere presence of stomach fluke in the forestomachs of cattle or sheep, or their eggs in the faeces, does not indicate that treatment is necessary. Clinical disease (paramphistomosis) only occurs in certain areas (for example, the NSW North Coast) and under defined conditions, and is due to duodenitis from large numbers of migrating immature fluke.

Nilzan(R) (levamisole + oxyclozanide),  especially now that Mansonil(R) (niclosamide) is no longer available,  is the only product effective to a useful degree against immature stomach fluke.

However the product is not registered in NSW for this use  in cattle. Off-label use can only legally be done under veterinary prescription. For this reason Nilzan was removed from the current edition of the stomach fluke Primefact, although veterinarians can get more information by checking the references listed in the Primefact.

Dr Joseph Boray – long time expert on stomach and liver fluke (and one of the people behind the development of triclabendazole), responded at my invitation to our discussion on treating for stomach fluke. Here below is his letter, used with permission.

Boray J-Mail0016-paramphistomes 1-200908

Boray J-Mail0016-paramphistomes 2-200908

==============================

stom fluke primefact

August 19, 2009

Useful links

Last updated 20090821

See links to useful sites in the sidebar (to the right), and below:

WormBoss

WormBoss

Primary Industries | Industry and Investment NSW

Cattle – worm control

Livestock – general

Livestock – health

Sheep health – incl. internal and external parasites

Vet Lab & Vet Lab Manual

Zoonoses

Other

Australian Sheep Industry Cooperative Research Centre

ANZDSPs – incl nematodes of ruminants

IPM-S (AWI)

Please let me know if any links are broken or need updating.

Thanks

SL.  20090821


May 28, 2009

DIY Worm Egg Counting; new lice test; SCAHLS – Dx Tests (Worms)

WormMail mailing list (recip. undisclosed)  (wormmail 200905281500)

Gear for DIY Worm Egg Counting

I get a number of inquiries from people who have already learnt how to do their own worm egg counts, but need to source equipment.

Below is information prepared (Feb. ’08) by Anne Oakenful (QA Manager, Elizabeth Macarthur Institute) as part of the manual NSW DPI’s ‘Faecal Egg Counting Course’

I have also added information from J Sewell who supplies microscopes and other equipment, and who kindly provided demonstration models at the FEC Courses I co-presented with Vicki Bordin in March and May.

One course participant said ‘Microscopes Australia’ is also worth checking.

Listing a supplier does not imply endorsement by DPI: we are merely providing some possibilities for you to check.

By the way, plans are afoot to run more of these courses in various parts of the state. I will endeavour to let you know when they are coming up.

Microscope slides
The Whitlock universal slide is specifically designed for parasite detection in large and small animals. They usually start at around $120.00 a slide but they are glass sides and do last a long time if looked after.

Whitlock Universal slides are available from:
JA Whitlock & Co
PO Box 51
Eastwood NSW 2122
Ph 02 96381142
Web site: www.whitlock.com.au slides@whitlock.com.au

Microscopes
There are a number of different sources of microscopes. Prices range depending on the quality.

The basic requirements for faecal egg counts are:
Compound Microscope with 40x – 100x magnification (10x eyepiece with 4x and 10x objectives)
Binocular eye pieces (monocular can be used however it can cause eye strain if doing multiple samples)
Mechanical stage
Power supply for lighting

The web is a good source of information on microscope products, prices and suppliers.
Most laboratory suppliers have a microscope range that covers the basic needs required for egg counts. eg

www.lomb.com.au
www.astro-optical.com.au
www.southernbiological.com
www.proscitech.com.au

Science Education Online www.scienceeducationonline.com.au
email: jwsewell1@bigpond.com fax: 02 6946 4412 postal: PO Box 28, Adelong NSW 2729

Microscopes Australia http://aunet.com.au/microscopes.htm

There are a number of overseas company’s that do freight to Australia. Some of their microscopes are cheaper and they do offer warranty. eg

http://store.amscope.com
www.microscopestore.com

EBAY occasionally have microscopes on sale and can be worth looking at from time to time to see what’s available.

Hydrometer
Battery hydrometers for checking specific gravity of salt solutions are readily available at most hardware stores, car spare parts stores etc. They are relatively cheap at around $10 and are a good investment to ensure that all salt solutions are at the required specific gravity to float parasite eggs for detection.

============================

SCAHLS – Standard Diagnostic Procedures – another good resource

The SCAHLS site is another good resource.

Of relevance to this newsletter is the current ‘ASDT’ for Anthelmintic resistance, written by Maxine Lyndal-Murphy (1993) of the Qld DPI. This contains good information. http://www.scahls.org.au/asdts/05-AnthelminiticResistanceinSheep.pdf

This ‘ASDT’ will be updated/replaced soon by an ‘ANZDSP’ (have you got all the acronyms worked out) written by Gareth Hutchinson, formerly of NSW DPI, and James Cook University.

The title: Nematode Parasites of Small Ruminants, Camelids and Cattle – Diagnosis with Emphasis on Anthelmintic Efficacy and Resistance Testing’

I have seen a final draft of this document and I think it will be a valuable resource, even for those not doing any lab testing.

Hopefully this will be published on the SCAHLS website within the next few months. (It’s a bit sad when you get excited by the prospect of new publication on worms).

============================

New lice test

OK, this is ‘ecto’ rather than ‘endo’, but it is great to see this test now seeing the light of day. (Ectos are the province of Gemma Junk, the NSW DPI Ectoparasite Coordinator, but I am sure she will let this one pass).

Here is the NSW DPI news release :

Lousy sheep no more – clean combs and cutters key to new lice test – 28 May 2009

A sensitive new test that can diagnose lice infestations at shearing will be available for wool producers from July, the NSW Department of Primary Industries (DPI) said today.

NSW DPI researchers who developed the laboratory test believe it will be highly economical and give producers confidence not to dip or backline as a precaution.

“The test could be used as part of management strategy to eradicate lice from properties and/or reduce chemical usage and hence residues in wool,” NSW DPI’s Paul Young said.

“The test uses washings from the cleaning of shearers’ combs and cutters.

“The washings detect protein from chopped up lice, trapped in grease accumulated on the combs and cutters as lousy sheep are shorn.”

The laboratory test is the culmination of many years’ financial investment and co-operative research between NSW DPI, Australian Wool Innovation and CSIRO Livestock Industries.

To be run at NSW DPI’s Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute (EMAI), Camden, the test is based on ELISA technology.

The EMAI team says the test can pay for itself many times over if producers choose not to dip, or back-line sheep that previously would have been treated “just in case they had lice”.

The test uses samples submitted by or on behalf of producers.

“Proper sample collection is absolutely essential and unless done correctly will invalidate the test results,” Mr Young, said.

“The kit’s information sheet provides detailed instructions for correct sample collection.

“Because of the sensitivity of the test it stipulates all the combs and cutters must be scrupulously clean before use.

“A ‘one sample’ kit may be used to collect a single sample from the shearing of a mob of up to 250 sheep.

“If a mob contains more than 250 sheep, more than one sample should be collected.

Any number of sample bottles can be provided on request.

“To ensure detection of low-level infestations of lice, all combs and cutters used to shear the mob of interest must be washed using the materials provided.”

The EMAI team advises producers not to be tempted to sample only some of the mob.

“Sometimes only a few sheep in a mob may be infested,” NSW DPI technical officer, Narelle Sales, said.

“Unless all the comb and cutter washings from the shearing of all of the sheep are included, the samples submitted to the laboratory may not contain any lice protein and the test result would be incorrectly interpreted.”

Further reading

From the June 2009 edition of Agriculture Today: Skip the dip

April 27, 2009

'new drench on the block'

This article is not just about the new sheep anthelmintic ‘Zolvix’ (monepantel).

love-snew-drench-on-the-block-zolvixvet-talkthe-land20090416-cropped8

Source: The Land newspaper, April 16, 2009;  page 72.

When will Australia get Zolvix? Frankly, I can only guess. According to one grim review, by David Leyonhjelm , it could be a couple of years.

Note: to see full width of the article pictured above, right click on the image/article and view in a new window.

April 8, 2009

Zolvix, Drench and WormTesting, Rametin, cryptosporidiosis, new cattle disease, hormones in food

[WormMail 20090408]

‘Zolvix’ website
Novartis has a website for the new anthelmintic, monepantel (Zolvix).   http://www.zolvix.com

As mentioned in previous WormMails, monepantel, recently launched (31 March) in Queenstown, NZ, belongs to the new drench group, the AADs (amino-acetonitrile derivatives)

Doing a Drench Test

Are you or a client contemplating doing a Drench Test (faecal worm egg count reduction test – FECRT)?

There is a guide in the NSW DPI Vet Lab Manual.   http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/vetmanual/specimens-by-disease-syndrome/diseases_of_livestock/anthelmintic_resistance

Some of the details may be a little dated, but it gives a good outline.

Quick and Dirty Test – DrenchCheck

Whether or not you do a ‘proper’ drench test, it is good to also do occasional checks on the trot.  To do a so-called DrenchCheck, collect samples from a mob of sheep 10-14 days (in the case of short-acting drenches) after they were drenched. You can refine the test still further by collecting samples on ‘day zero’ – the day of drenching – as well.

Consider getting a larval culture done (‘worm type’) as well: this will give you more useful information.

Worm egg counting

View short video clips about worm egg counting at the WormBoss website.  http://www.wormboss.com.au/LivePage.aspx?pageId=374

Rametin resistance?

In the space of a week I have had two conversation regarding suspected naphthalophos-resistant Haemonchus (barbers pole worm).
Naphthalophos of course is marketed as Rametin (Bayer), and also in recent years as Combat (Virbac) and Pole Vault.

I know of only two published reports of confirmed naphthalophos resistance in Australia:

* Green PE, Forsyth BA, Rowan KJ and Payne G (1981). The isolation of a field strain of Haemonchus contortus in Queensland showing multiple anthelmintic resistance. Australian Veterinary Journal 57(2): 79–84.

* Le Jambre LF, Geoghegan J and Lyndal-Murphy M (2005). Characterization of moxidectin resistant Trichostrongylus colubriformis and Haemonchus contortus. Veterinary Parasitology 128: 83–90.

From time to time, other instances of resistance to naphthalophos on Australian sheep farms have been suspected. To my knowledge, none of these have been confirmed, which is not to say that it won’t happen.

When naphthalophos resistance in Haemonchus is suspected, one matter to investigate is whether the burden at the time of treatment was dominated by immatures and adults. While naphthalophos is near to 100% effective against adult Haemonchus contortus, it is reportedly (pers.comm.) only about 70% effective against immatures , more or less in the usual range of efficacy that the drug has always had against (adult) Teladorsagia (Ostertagia) circumcincta (small brown stomach worm), and Trichostrongylus species (black scour worms).

NAP – a ‘mid-spectrum’ drench – is commonly used in combination  with broadspectrum drenches, including levamisole and/or benzimidazoles, and also, more recently, macrocyclic lactones.  This is to increase efficacy, and also to provide the potential ”resistance slowing’ benefits of a combination.  NAP and LEV and/or BZ in combination also provides a non-ML rotation option.

NAP combined with LEV and/or BZ can give surprisingly good results, even with considerable resistance in the scour worms to the LEV and/or BZ actives, but results can be quite variable. Some of the multi-drug resistant Teladorsagia isolates in WA are becoming increasingly difficult to control with these combinations, but how much if any of this is due to NAP-resistance is unclear to me.

In any case, the general advice applies: always test the drenches or drench combinations you may want to use on your property. And once adopted, do follow-up testing from time totime using DrenchChecks.

Extras (below; not necessarily worm-related)

* New cattle disease

* Sydney’s cryptosporidium outbreak  (by the way, we are still working on a Primefact about Zoonoses)

* Hormone myths and blindspots

Stephen Love
Veterinarian/State Coordinator-Internal Parasites,
NSW DPI – Armidale District Office

Extras

New cattle disease to rival mad cow disease
LONDON, April 1 AFP|Published: Monday April 1, 1:50 PM

Veterinary Researchers in the UK have discovered a new cattle disease that could be worse than mad cow disease.  There is no known treatment for the disease, which has no clinical signs and which is impossible to detect through laboratory testing.  Fortunately no cases have been reported so far.

CRYPTOSPORIDIOSIS – AUSTRALIA : (NEW SOUTH WALES)  From ProMed

Crypto clue: one person to blame for outbreak
- ———————————————
Genetic testing has revealed that Sydney’s cryptosporidium outbreak
may have stemmed from a single infected person. The finding means it
is unlikely that an infected animal or environmental conditions, such
as the weather, are to blame. Since the beginning of last month
[February 2009], when the latest outbreak appeared, 628 people have
fallen ill, compared with 482 in all of last year [2008].

Macquarie University researchers say their testing is experimental,
and unlikely to identify the origin of the current outbreak, but they
hope their work will lead to the development of a world-leading,
inexpensive automated test to quickly identify parasite strains
involved in future outbreaks, allowing sources to be rapidly traced
and infections contained.

Michelle Power, of Macquarie’s biological sciences department, said
cryptosporidium outbreaks were difficult to trace using existing
technology. There are 2 key parasite “species” that infect people:
_Cryptosporidium hominis_, only contracted by direct human to human
contact, and _Cryptosporidium parvum_, which can also be transmitted by
animals. For each type there were about 40 different strains.

However, virtually nothing was known about which strains were
responsible for most outbreaks. A decade after the contamination of
Warragamba Dam, which forced Sydneysiders to boil their water, “we
still just know that it was cryptosporidium,” Dr Power said. “To put
it simply, we’re looking for the easiest way to fingerprint the organisms.”

With the new test it should be possible to compare results from
individual patients to seek common patterns.

“We could look to see if they had all eaten at the same restaurant,
or been to the same day-care centre or swimming pool.”

The NSW Health Department has provided hundreds of fecal samples from
the latest outbreak for testing by a Macquarie University parasite
researcher, Liette Waldron.

“We have analysed about 250 samples from the current outbreak, and
they are all the same strain” of _Cryptosporidium hominis_, Dr Power said.

If it had originated from different sources she would have expected
to see multiple strains. When sporadic cases, reported over the past
12 months, were analysed they identified 24 strains, involving both
the human and animal species.

Dr Power said people who were infected, but not necessarily appearing
ill, usually had 5000 to 10 000 parasites per gram of faeces.
However, some samples from the latest outbreak contained more than 1
million. “The more parasites you see, the more nasty it is.”

Over the next 2 years the project, funded by the Australian Research
Council and the Health Department,will “fingerprint” parasites from
up to 4000 cryptosporidium patients.

[Byline: Richard Macey]

A ProMED-mail post
<http://www.promedmail.org>
ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases
<http://www.isid.org>

Date: 31 Mar 2009
Source: The Sydney Morning Herald [edited]
<http://www.smh.com.au/national/crypto-clue-one-person-to-blame-for-outbreak-20090330-9h2q.html>

- –
Communicated by:
ProMED-mail
<promed@promedmail.org>

[Genetic fingerprinting is a very useful tool to identify the spread
of microorganisms in a community and thus to help identify the source
and transmission routes. The new knowledge that the outbreak
probably has a single human source underlines the importance of
interrupting transmission to control the outbreak. - Mod.EP

Life-cycle diagram of _Cryptosporidium hominis_ at:
<http://www.dpd.cdc.gov/DPDx/images/ParasiteImages/A-F/Cryptosporidiosis/Cryptosporidium_LifeCycle.gif>
Electron micrograph of _C. parvum_ at:
<http://www.qualitywater.co.uk/images/clip_image001.jpg>
- - Mod.JW

A map showing the location of New South Wales in Australia can be found at:
<http://www.infoplease.com/atlas/country/australia.html>.
- - CopyEd.EJP]

Hormone myths and blindspots
‘Interesting that so many believe that  hormones are used in Australia in chicken production, but have a blindspot regarding hormones in milk.
Chicken reference: http://www.abc.net.au/rural/sa/content/2006/s1673928.htm
Cow milk reference: The Paleo Diet Update Issue: # 2009 – 14 /April 3, 2009 Prof. Loren Cordain, Ph.D. www.ThePaleoDiet.com

March 26, 2009

Prime time to hammer liver fluke

TO: WormMail (recipients undisclosed)   [WormMail 200903261145]

Prime time to hammer liver fluke

Yesterday’s media release

http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/aboutus/news/recent-news/agriculture-news-releases/hammer-fluke

25 Mar 2009
Livestock producers in liver fluke-prone areas on the tablelands, slopes and coast have been reminded that autumn is the best time to treat animals with flukicides.NSW Department of Primary Industries (DPI) veterinarian, Stephen Love, said cattle and sheep should be drenched after the onset of frosts in April or May to eliminate fluke they have picked up in summer and early autumn.

“Strategic treatment during mid to late autumn can prevent a major rise in pasture contamination and significant production losses in stock affected by fluke,” Dr Love said.

“Traditional flukey areas can expect problems now following the good conditions which have boosted survival and spread of snails which host liver fluke.

“Known snail habitats should be avoided for as long as possible, particularly for sheep goats, alpacas and younger cattle.”

According to Dr Love the presence of liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica, can be confirmed by blood tests and faecal egg counts.

“We advise producers to use the most efficient flukicides, triclabendazole-based products or the new nitroxynil, clorsulon and ivermectin one-shot injection for cattle, to minimise fluke carry-over into spring,” he said.

For more information on liver fluke and other internal parasites producers can contact Dr Love, (02) 6738 8519, your local vet or explore WormBoss, www.wormboss.com.au

Further reading

Liver fluke – the basics

Liver fluke disease in sheep and cattle

Media contact: Bernadette York, (02) 6391 3936 or 0427 773 785

Extras

WormBoss – some background blurb

For those who came in late:

“Australia is one of the world’s leading producers of lamb. There are 47,296 Australian properties with sheep and lambs (ABS June 2007).
Worms cost Australian sheep producer more than any other disease and for producers; sustainable management and control of sheep worms is essential for future success.
WormBoss represents the national knowledge on sheep worms and their management. It has been developed by the Australian Sheep Industry Cooperative Research Centre (Sheep
CRC) and Australian Wool Innovation (AWI) to help producers meet worm challenges. There are currently over 2,000 subscribers to the WormBoss website and they benefit from
monthly updates on worm management and enhancing animal productivity.(Nicola Raymond, Currie Communications)”.

“WormBoss is a world first product that attempts to provide Australian sheep producers with a comprehensive information resource available 24/7.The project was a jointly funded exercise by Australian Wool Innovation and The Sheep Industry Cooperative Research Centre (CRC).
It was launched in March 2005, and currently attracts between 3000 and 5000 site visits each month WormBoss receives financial and other support from the Animal Health Alliance – a body representing most Veterinary Pharmaceutical Companies and drench resellers.
WormBoss also provides people who subscribe on the website with a monthly “Seasonal Worm Outlook” by email (over 1000, including a large proportion from the industry advisory and service sector) (Arthur Le Feuvre, National WormBoss Team)”.
New quick test for worms http://www.sheepcrc.org.au/news-and-events/press-releases/8-new-quick-test-for-worms.php
Biosecurity website http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/biosecurity ‘NSW Department of Primary Industries (DPI) has launched a one-stop biosecurity information website to keep farmers and the community up-to-date with the latest developments in the detection and prevention of pests, animal diseases and weeds in NSW’.

December 17, 2008

some useful links – worms, animal health

Filed under: sheep management,sheep worms — SL @ 12:47 pm
Tags: , , , ,

NSW DPI – internal parasites (‘Worms on the Web’)    (last updated: 14 May 2009)

Cattle worm control

Goat worm control*

* The general principles of sheep worm control are applicable to goats

Sheep worm control

Turning the Worm newsletter

WormFax (monthly)

WormMail – subscribe /unsubscribe

Health – links to various

NSW DPI – other

Animal Health Surveillance Newsletter

Bioscecurity Newsletter

NSW DPI News – subscribe

Vet Lab Manual

‘Boss’ Websites

WormBoss

WormBoss News – subscribe

LiceBoss

December 12, 2008

WormBoss in the The Land

Filed under: sheep management,sheep worms,wormboss — SL @ 2:15 pm

WormBoss in the news (The Land) -December 11 page 58 (Livestock section)  [WormMail 20081212.1400)

WormBoss in the The Land  – David Stillard – one of the winners

See  The Land newspaper, 11 December 2008, page 58 (livestock section)

(This article does not appear to be on-line)

Also see

http://theland.farmonline.com.au/news/nationalrural/livestock/news/win-big-with-worms/1342855.aspx

December 10, 2008

Summer drenching for sheep worms in south-eastern and Western Australia

[WormMail 20081210]

Stephen Love

Veterinarian/State Coordinator -Internal Parasites

NSW DPI, Armidale

Below are two perspectives on summer drenching: an article from Bruce Watt (District Veterinarian, Bathurst), representing a south eastern Australian view, and the other from Dr RB Besier, Principal Veterinary Parasitologist, Albany WA, sharing the latest on summer drenching in Western Australia

‘Summer drenching’ refers to one or two strategic drenches (in summer), based on work by CSIRO scientists such as Norm Anderson and others in non-seasonal and winter rainfall sheep raising areas of Australia. The idea is to ‘kick ‘em when they are down’: that is, drench the sheep when worms on pasture are in rapid decline due to hostile conditions (hot, dry summer weather).

The upside is good worm control, and this is achieved with just one or two summer drenches, as opposed to the several drenches that may be required if worm control was based on a tactical rather than a strategic approach once the rains began in autumn.

The downside, with the benefit of hindsight, is that summer drenching in these climactic zones may increase selection for drench resistance, particularly in Mediterranean climates and when sheep are drenched and moved onto cereal stubbles. This is because there are relatively few worms ‘in refugium’ (mostly those on pasture and thus escaping exposure to the drench) in the hot, dry summers of south eastern and western Australia.

One of the first widely adopted strategic programs employing summer drenching was the DrenchPlan program for central and southern NSW, launched in 1985; one year after WormKill  in northern of NSW. These ground breaking strategic programs were a cooperative effort involving CSIRO, Pastures (now Rural Lands) Protection Boards, NSW Agriculture (now DPI), as well as the private sector (still the private sector).

Initially there were two summer drenches in DrenchPlan, one when pasture was haying off around November, and the second in February. In the version for lower rainfall areas (<350 mm p.a.), such as the Riverina (Deniliquin and other districts), the second summer drench was deleted, except in unseasonably wet summers.

As drench resistance escalated, DrenchPlan morphed into a modified strategic program around 1997, with the second summer drench being made conditional on the results of worm egg count monitoring.

About the same time in WA, there were moves afoot to modify the strategic program there as well, with a view to finding a better balance between worm control and selection for drench resistance.

Ivermectin resistance of Ostertagia (Teladorsagia), small brown stomach worm) developed very quickly, despite the drench being used only once a year. In some cases, resistance was detected after just 4 years.

Ways of increasing the number of worms ‘in refugium’ were explored, including leaving a small percentage of adult sheep un-drenched at the summer drench. More recently attention has focussed on not drenching adults at the beginning of summer, and drenching them instead in April. This approach has been tested by Dr Rob Woodgate and others in WA as part of the AWI-supported ‘IPM-S project’.

And now for the articles by Bruce Watt and Brown Besier. Keep in mind, as discussed by Love (2007), that while the principles may apply widely, the practicalities may not apply to all of the climatic types within non-seasonal and winter rainfall areas of Australia.

Summer drenching: south-eastern Australia

Bruce Watt, District Veterinarian,

Central Tablelands RLPB, Bathurst, NSW

[This article was a newspaper article, published recently throughout the Central West of NSW, and is republished with permission]

With pastures haying off especially in the more western and southern areas of the tablelands now is the time to plan summer drenching. Summer drenching has been the mainstay of sheep worm control in southern Australia for nearly thirty years. It has been a popular program as it has been highly effective and is easy to understand and to recommend to farmers. However, it has been criticised as contributing to worms developing drench resistance.

Parasite control in sheep is a compromise between effective control to prevent disease and production loss in the short term and management to prevent resistance developing in the long term. As each producer has a different set of priorities as well as a different farm and environment, blanket recommendations are a bit tricky. I caught up with some veterinary colleagues from a diversity of higher rainfall environments to get their opinions.

John Evers, District Veterinarian at Young, and  parasitologists Stephen Love with NSW DPI at Armidale and John Larsen from the McKinnon Project at the University of Melbourne may not be keen on admitting it but between them, I estimate they have a century of experience in parasite control in higher rainfall areas of south-eastern Australia.

All agree that in the temperate parts of SE Australia a first summer drench for all sheep is close to mandatory. Give this drench after pastures have hayed off. For ewes with lambs at foot, this is most practical at weaning.

An alternate approach for producers with good management skills who are more concerned about the development of resistance is to sample some mobs of ewes before the first summer drench. Mobs with an egg count below 100 epg could be omitted from the drenching program. Producers taking this option need to monitor their sheep especially if it rains over the summer.

Another strategy to delay resistance is to leave a small percentage of the mob un-drenched. To many this sounds crazy but the theory is that a small number of un-drenched ewes carry their unselected worms through into the autumn and winter so the subsequent worm population is composed mostly of non-resistant worms. (This is potentially not good in areas with more Haemonchus and you get a wet summer).

John, Stephen and John agreed that this idea is most appropriate for good managers and in areas with hot dry summers. Further east we know that some worms survive quite well on pastures over the summer anyway and leaving a portion of the mob un-drenched may increase the risk of worm build-up either in a wet summer or in the following autumn or winter.

Even though we sometimes find very low egg counts in lambs at weaning, they should always be drenched. This is because we can’t be sure that they are harbouring immature worms, because little weaners need all the help they can get to survive the summer and autumn and because we can’t risk contaminating the weaning paddock.

Consider an egg count from a mob just before and 10-14 days after you drench to check the effectiveness of your drench. It is a quick and easy way of checking to see if you have some resistance, as an effective drench should reduce the egg count by 95%. If you have relied on the ML group of drenches consider drenching with a mix including an organo-phosphate such as Rametin® or Colleague®. I will discuss the OP drenches in a later article.

New rules for summer drenching of adult sheep: simple and sustainable (Western Australia)

Brown Besier, Principal Veterinary Parasitologist

Dept. Ag WA, Albany WA

[This article was written for 'AgMemo' in WA, October 2008, and is republished with permission].

For some years we have known that while summer drenching gives very effective sheep worm control, it enables resistant worms to survive in preference to others. Over time, this can lead to an increase in the level of drench resistance across a farm.

Research shows that a small change to the time of drenching adult sheep will significantly reduce the risk of this disadvantage. By deliberately ensuring that some non-resistant worms survive on the farm, resistant ones will no longer be in the majority and the development of resistance will decrease.

Summer drenching recommendations

Weaners and hoggets: No change, give a drench to all sheep once the pasture becomes dry, or as they move onto a crop stubble. These sheep are still growing and no risk with worms should be taken.

Adult sheep (2 ½ years onward): do not drench in summer, but give a drench in early April. Mature animals in WA rarely have significant worm burdens in summer, but immature worms sometimes develop to the adult stage by autumn and often justify removing.

Ewes before lambing: no drench if lambing from April to June, but later lambing ewes may need a pre-lamb drench 2-3 weeks before lambs are due to drop.

All drenches should be given with a fully-effective drench, ideally after a test to confirm that it will work.

More efficient control

Worm egg counts show whether a worm burdens justifies drenching, and this enables farmers to fine-tune worm control programs. This is especially useful to check whether an autumn drench to adult sheep is needed, or whether ewes need a pre-lamb drench. Scouring or poor growth is common in winter as worm burdens increase, and the need for a drench is easily seen with a worm egg count.

Other non-chemical methods of worm control should also be used as a routine. Pasture movements planned so young sheep do not graze paddocks with high levels of worm larvae will reduce the need for drenching. Sheep in good nutritional condition are less susceptible to worms, and buying rams selected for a superior resistance to worms will lead to a long-term reduction in drenching. Consulting an animal health adviser or private veterinarian is recommended to develop the most efficient worm control plan for a particular property.

References and further reading

Love S (2005). DrenchPlan 2005. Primefact 14, 1st Edition, September 2005. Retrieved December 2008 from http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/livestock/sheep/health/internal/drenchplan-2005

Love S and Evers J (2005). DrenchPlan: the basics. Primefact 54, September 2005. Retrieved December 2008 from http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/38828/drenchplan-the-basics.pdf

Love S (2007). Sheep worm control: summer versus winter drenching in southern NSW. Primefact 479, 1st Edition, June 2007. Retrieved December 2008 from http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/livestock/sheep/health/internal/sheep-summer-winter-drenching

© State of New South Wales through NSW Department of Primary Industries 2008. You may copy, distribute and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose, provided that you attribute NSW Department of Primary Industries as the owner.

Check for updates of Primefacts at: www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/primefacts

Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (December 2008). However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to check currency of the information with the appropriate officer of New South Wales Department of Primary Industries or the user’s independent adviser.

Next Page »

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.